On 15/09/12 01:44, Peter Ekman wrote: > Anonymity in the screening process is probably necessary. Without some > anonymity things might get very tricky and emotional. I'll readily > admit that I've made some mistakes in screening - if you go through > 1,000s of pix fairly quickly how could there not be mistakes? and I > think most people will understand this. Except when somebody puts > forth his special "baby" to the public ...
I agree the rejections should not be public. X marked your picture as not worthy for winning sends a bad signal. But the 'perfect' app should keep track of who voted what. The example of someone using the app to discard the photos by anyone else comes to mind. _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
