On 23/09/12 20:36, WereSpielChequers wrote: > Three things about that amazing calender: > > 1 The description could do with being just slightly bigger for those of > us with less than perfect eyesight
+1. It is barely readable at 1:1. It doesn't need to be big, but neither so small. > 2 Where is the attribution to the photographers? There is a final page > which quotes the file names and repeats the license 12 times, but the > photographers are unnamed, or are those strange //s a placeholder that > will be replaced with their names. The names are at the left of "CC-BY-SA 3.0" in that last page. No idea what those // are for. For titles maybe, but I don't know why they wouldn't have been included. In my opinion the author and CC-BY-SA 3.0 could also be present at the image page. The last page could contain and a link to the each description page in addition to the names and CC-BY-SA 3.0 A link to what the CC-BY-SA 3.0 is, would also be good (remember that 4.b.I requisite). _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
