On 08/10/12 14:45, Tomasz Ganicz wrote: > Moreover - it puts files on lists which have moved heritage template > to the relevant category. In case of Polish contest if the heritage > has its own category we asked mass-uploaders to put the file into the > category without heritage template in file description. See for > axample: > > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Jewish_cemetery_in_Cz%C4%99stochowa
IMHO the files should both have the relevant identifier and be in the category. If I came to the description page (eg. by Special:Search), I wouldn't know it was a monument without having to visit all its categories, which is impractical. > On the list there are also files with quite proper, but probably too > lenghty heritage number. In Poland the number consist of: > a) the number itself - for example "A-253" > b) the date of registraton for example "A-253 z 18.03.1972" > c) the name of viodoship which registered the heritage, for example > ""A-253 z 18.03.1972; województwo podkarpackie" > > Numbers itslef are redundant - each voivodship has its own list > starting from A-1 till A-9999, > > so for us this list of heratige without proper indetifiers is rather > useless and completely missleading. For us it is not a problem - as > our jury won't be using it - but it may produce false statistics for > our part of contest. Argh. So you basically made a new division inside the template parameter. I can compensate that in the code. I had no idea you were doing that. Although there are multiple formats used: A-1834 z 11.08.2008 916 z 09.11.1984 1061 1101/92 z 14.04.1992 A/3102/78 i 79 147/Wlkp/A A.734 z 24.05.1993 1598-A z 23.11.1995 What is the identifier that should be extracted? _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
