This is interesting: so it is possible to get a license for the use of the logo if used apprppriately.
Barbara, are you going to send the email? Kind regards, Els 2012/11/19 Matthew Roth <[email protected]> > This is a good point, but I'd imagine the WMF can grant a license for use > of the logo. This seems like an entirely appropriate and favorable use, but > IANAL. > If you send an email to [email protected] explaining the usage, > they should be able to draw up a license agreement. > > thanks, > Matthew > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 2012/11/19 Els Arends <[email protected]>: >> > Okay, I get the point about the seasons. >> > >> > Maybe others can voice their ideas about the Wikipedialogo and the >> > Wikimedialogo in the colophon? >> > >> >> I guess it would be OK for free samples - but in fact - these extra >> copies which are about to be purchased by chapters is a subject of >> commercial use of Wikipedia logo by third party :-) >> >> >> >> -- >> Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz >> http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek >> http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/ >> http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> > > > > -- > > Matthew Roth > Global Communications Manager > Wikimedia Foundation > +1.415.839.6885 ext 6635 > www.wikimediafoundation.org > *https://donate.wikimedia.org* > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
