Hi Santi, is there an easy way to confirm somehow that an image that has n/d actually has been confirmed to contain a monument?
Best, Lodewijk 2012/12/13 Santiago Navarro Sanz <[email protected]> > Lodewijk. In Spain there are some monuments without ID. On Wikipedia > lists volunteers put a n/d (not available = no disponible) or left it > empty, but the pictures of these monuments were easily recognizable with > the name of the picture. > > The pictures that we recognized as pictures of monuments not elegible or > simply that showed a thing that was not a monument we removed their > template of WLM and put them in a special category. > > Santi (Millars) > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 23:50:13 +0100 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Definitions of participating photos > > > Hi all, > > just like last year, I am working on applying for recognition of Wiki > Loves Monuments as the World Largest Photography Competition. We should be > easily able to meet this record, but the evidence is always a bit tricky to > generate. Just like last year, I'd like to be able to send them a full list > of all participating images. > > However, for other purposes we might need different definitions. I'd like > to suggest a few different definitions here. > > == Retention statistics == > For running retention statistics etc, I'd like to use wide definitions of > participating people and images: If the uploader *thought* he was validly > submitting, that is good enough. After all, here it is the intention that > counts. So this list should ideally include every image that ever contained > the Wiki Loves Monuments template. No matter if the image was deleted, > disqualified or if the country didn't submit finalists. > > * No matter which country > * No matter the license / deleted or not > * No matter the monument template > * But within the time frame that the contest was ongoing (to have 'clear' > stats for a full month of contest) > > == Guinness == > This will be the strictest definition because we cannot afford a single > mistake (that would make the process much more painful and long) and we > have easily beaten the record anyway so we can afford this. > > For this purpose, we should generate a clean list of images that > definitely fulfill the criteria. This means among others that a submission > is for this definition only considered valid if it really made a chance to > win the international prize (similar to last year). That means for example > unfortunately that images from Belgium & Luxembourg & South Tyrol cannot > participate for this definition. (Belgium & Luxembourg didn't submit > finalists, so strictly speaking those images never made any chance to win > the international competition. For Italy (including South Tyrol) there was > a bit more complicated rule due to local legislation that there had to be a > permission from the soprintendenza (if you want details, please ask the > local organizers!) etc. > > * Participating in one of the 33 countries that submitted nominees for the > finale. > * License OK > * Not deleted > * Monument template with existing monument ID in the database has to be > present (should there be exception countries to this?) In the case of > Italy, the monument has to be on the 'cleared list' (can someone provide a > complete cleared list as it was valid for the competition 2012?) > * Uploaded within the time frame for that country. Exception is mass > uploads from mobile platform and Flickr. I believe Platonides has a > whitelist for these bot uploaders? > > Am I missing any other criteria that could invalidate according to such a > strict definition? I'm skipping the 'activated email address' because in > practice we have reminded people of activating that if relevant on several > occasions. > > I'd like to get started with this soon, so any quick feedback would be > welcome. > > Kind regards, > > Lodewijk > > _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments > mailing list [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
