You are probably right that having it completely automated would have the potential of causing havok.
I think the solution similar to "unused images" is probably the better since it allows a person to make sure the category actually makes sense and (using the first of the two tools) can additionally recommend categories to be created. /André On 16 January 2013 18:25, Maarten Dammers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi André, > > Op 16-1-2013 0:43, André Costa schreef: > > Would it be possible to populate the same field using the commons > templates if they are present used on a (unique) category page? I.e. as is > done at > Category:Aaltohuset<https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aaltohuset> > . > > Technically yes, but I'm afraid of mistakes so I'm not doing it using a > bot. I do plan to run some queries to suggest links to create (see .sql for > the query): > * http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_top_images.txt: > List of tagged Rijksmonumenten images by number of images with the same > id. This can be used to suggest new categories to be created > * > http://toolserver.org/~multichill/temp/queries/erfgoed/rm_commonscat_to_link.txt: > List of categories that are tagged with a Rijksmonumenten template. This > can be combined with the database to suggest missing links to create just > like > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Monuments_database/Unused_images > > Maarten > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
