That is actually not something very unique. This happens in quite a few coutnries, and in that case the photographer will simply have to get the permission to enter and take the photo. Sometimes simpler than other times of course :)
The same of course goes for interiors of monuments, which are in some cases separately protected. This is no reason to remove them from the lists though - they are still monuments. And when it is the only thing left to photograph, the owner is more likely to be swayed to give permission once. Lodewijk 2013/8/27 Yaroslav M. Blanter <[email protected]> > On 27.08.2013 02:27, Jeremy Baron wrote: > >> You may also find that some NRHP sites have signs up explicitly >> prohibiting photography (including from the road or sidewalk). I don't >> remember details re content or placement of these signs but I'm pretty >> sure e.g. the [[Brooklyn Bridge]] has them posted. (Maybe they only >> cover some parts of the bridge?) >> >> > And on top of that there are many sites in the US which are physically > impossible to photograph without entering private property. > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/**wikilovesmonuments<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments> > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.**org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org> >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
