Thanks for the nice tools and incredible statistics. However, for future planing purpose, can we have... * visits to competition site statistics -> This helps we understand conversion rate (visit->submission) * HTTP referrer information -> This helps we know what medium/site drives people to the competition. * fraction of up-loaders who are existing Wikimedians & contributions of new Wikimedians in the next few month. * fraction of ineligible/delete submission (after juries and volunteers have gone through them) * correlation of WLM's output/ranking and Wikipedia, sister projects, chapter's -> This help us understand whether, in a country, WLM outperforms or underperforms its current potential or just doing on average.
I'm new here. Let me know if these information is (or will be) available. Or if you have raw data, I am happy to analyse them and produce a report on the above points. Taweetham On 2 October 2013 05:19, Cristian Consonni <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/10/1 Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]>: >> 2013/10/1 Cristian Consonni <[email protected]>: >>> ... seems very close to the one of 2012: >>> https://toolserver.org/~emijrp/wlm/stats.php >>> >>> ~6k picture less on the last day but ~6k pictures more in the >>> next-to-last-day. >> >> It is just because the most mass uploaders are the same as in 2012 - >> and they learnt that it is better to upload picture a day in advance, >> so they finished a day eariler :-) (Just my gues) > > (also last year the last day was on Sunday, this year on Monday so the > day-before-the-last was Sunday when I think more people have time to > upload photos) > > C > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
