FYI: There will be a public event about the report next week: https://www.facebook.com/events/1437520346560917/
Hopefully there will be an option to discuss this issues there. Best, Samat On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Lodewijk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > it seems that the WMF evaluation department has once again put together an > evaluation of Wiki Loves Monuments. Out of curiosity, were any of the > organizers involved in this? A quick glance suggests some factual errors, > and again a big focus on assuming WLM is a consistent project, that is > similar in each country (while in reality it is a diverse collection of > projects, tailored to the needs of each country, by its community) and with > a focus towards number crunching. > > Statements that begin with 'the average Wiki Loves Monuments > implementation/contest' make my eyes bleed... Did anyone make a more > thorough analysis of the report? > > Best, > Lodewijk > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
