2015-07-26 18:38 GMT+02:00 Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemow...@gmail.com>:
> Andy Mabbett, 26/07/2015 18:28: > >> 1) the name of the object may not be unique hence we may be unable to >>> satisfy Wikidata requirements on label/description uniqueness, >>> >> >> Wikidata does not require unique names. >> > > If so, please fix the docs. "Uniqueness for a combination of a label and a > description is a hard constraint that must be satisfied before a change can > be saved." https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Glossary This doc is right but you can use aliases. 3) it must be fine to create items that contain no information other than >>> the name; >>> >> >> No, this is not OK (and they may be deleted); but nor is it necessary. >> > > How so? We often don't know more than the name- > Did you have an example? I find it hard to believe, can't you at least you can say where it is (at the minimum the country and idealy the city, the coordinates, etc.). > > >> 4) it must be as easy to add coordinates to multiple items as it is with >>> an >>> on-wiki table; >>> >> >> Why? >> > > Because that's the process used to add coordinates. > > >> 6) it must be easy to publish new groups of items on the go, because the >>> list is built gradually (and very slowly) as we get new authorisations; >>> >> >> It is. >> > > Needs to be verified with those who maintain the list (i.e. Cristian Cenci > and WMIT secretariat). > > >> This is, I believe, possible. For example: >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Mietchen/Wikidata_lists/Items_with_ORCIDs >> >> is built by a bot. >> > > That's a very trivial query, on WDQ just claim[496]. The query I described > is way more complex. Can't Lua module deal with more complex query? Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org