Hey Johnattan, Typically, countries follow the official list - which will never be perfect. In some countries this is particularly sensitive, because it represents a specific period in the history.
There are a few approaches you could take, but none are real solutions. I would myself totally not be in favor of just 'adding monuments to the list'. Only in the case of a technical/clerical error, I would suggest to do that. But this sounds more like you disagree with the government on what the definition should be. What they did in South Africa, if I recall correctly, was to create a separate list, where people could make suggestions for buildings to be recognised as monument - a list they would pass on to the government at the end of the competition. You could even ask people to submit photos for that, but those would - I think - be out of competition. Best, Lodewijk 2016-08-17 10:35 GMT+02:00 Yaroslav M. Blanter <pute...@mccme.ru>: > Johnattan Rupire писал 2016-08-17 06:15: > >> HI all, >> What we can do with the monuments that aren't in the authorities list >> for low coverage from government? There are a decision about this from >> International team? some advices? I think here we have many monuments in >> many government list. How you do with these kind of monuments? >> >> thanks! >> > > Every team decides what they want to do. In Russia, for example, the > official database is buggy and incomplete, and we are adding many monuments > to the lists by hand (and also removing some which are included multiple > times). > > Cheers > Yaroslav > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list WikiLovesMonuments@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org