Hi Lily,
thank you for all the istructions.

Italy is organising the jury. We have a large amount of pictures, so we will have a preliminary phase of pre-jury, and than a meeting with the final jury, made by expert wikipedians and famous photographers. You will know the 10 winning photos until the term of 25th October.

I didn't organise this phase in the last edition, so every help with the tool is welcome (I'm not an expert in programming or complex wiki-tools, but I can trust in Nemo's support ;-) ).

Best regards,
Cristian


Il 26/09/2016 11:07, Ilya Korniyko ha scritto:
Hi  Leila,
Ukraine will not be able to submit photographs by October 25.
We need a month for jury work till November 1.
Regards,
Ilya, on behalf of the WLM Ukraine organizing committee

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Lily <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Hi all,


    If you are a WLM organizer, jury coordinator in the national
    level, or a jury member, this email can contain crucial
    information for you. Everyone else, you can safely stop here. :)


    This email contains some best practices on how to run your local
    jury process with regards to criteria, jury membership and
    process. Finally, it includes some instructions on how to choose
    your jury tool.


    Timeline

    You should plan to start the jury process as soon as the
    competition ends in your country, this is October 1 for many of
    you. :) The international team expects to receive the top 10
    photos of your country no later than October 25.


    Judging criteria

    While every national competition can choose the judging criteria
    based on the specific needs of the country, the international team
    recommends the following three judging criteria to be considered
    in the country-level jury processes: technical quality,
    originality, and usefulness of the photo for Wikipedia. If you are
    interested to learn more about these criteria, please read more
    about the judging criteria
    <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org/judging-criteria/>that the
    international jury will be using as explained in this blogpost by
    Lodewijk.


    Local jury set-up

    National competitions typically have a jury with at least 3
    members (the more photos, the more jury members). The local jury
    set-up is usually defined based on the judging criteria you will
    choose to go with. The international team recommends that,
    depending on the number of photos you expect to have by the end of
    the contest, you have 1-3 Wikimedians (maybe those with
    quality/featured images on Commons), 1-3 people who are familiar
    or are experts in the heritage of your country (especially the
    monuments), and 1-3 people who are professional or (quality)
    amateur photographers. Of course, all jury members should be
    excluded from winning prizes awarded by the jury.  The national
    jury can then nominate maximum 10 photos per country for the
    international finale.


    Jury process

    The jury process on the national level is defined by each country.
    The international team recommends the following process:


    Round 1: Yes/No or rating

    The goal of this round is to lower the number of competing photos
    to 400-700. If your total number of pictures is less than 500, you
    can skip this round.

    Jury members are asked to vote yes/no for each photo they are
    shown and are requested to stick to a maximum number of ‘yes’
    votes (for example, 500). Based on these votes, a set of 400-700
    photos is selected for the next round. If you have many photos,
    you may have to do this round in two steps.


    Round 2: Rating

    The goal of this round is to come to a selection of the top-50
    images. Jury members are asked to rate/score each image with 1-5
    stars. Based on the average from their votes, the top-50 is
    selected for the next round. If there are many pictures with
    similar scores, the coordinator can choose to select a top-40,
    top-60, etc.


    Round 3: Live meeting or ranking

    The goal of this round is to arrive at a final ranking and winning
    pictures. If geographically feasible, the jury can meet in person.
    The jury tool supports an alternative method: ranking. Each jury
    member is asked to rank their favorite 20 photos in order. Based
    on this ranking, points are awarded to each photo (20 for the
    number 1, 19 for number 2, etc). The total number of points
    determines the final result. Jury members are also asked to give a
    reason for selecting their top images. You can use this latter
    information to explain explain why the winner was selected, an
    information that can be useful for your jury report and press
    releases.


    Jury tool

    Unless you have a very small number of submissions (less than
    100), it's usually efficient for your jury to use one of the
    available tools
    <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Jury_tools>for judging
    the photos. The international team would like to bring your
    attention to two tools: ‘Montage’ and ‘WLX’. Below you can find
    more information about these two tools. We suggest that you look
    into these tools now, and make your choice soon.


    Montage

    Montage is the new tool that has been developed this year by
    volunteers and per the request by the WLM international team.
    There are two features of the tool that are worth pointing out:
    The tool is designed and developed in a way that can accommodate
    the recommended jury process explained above (yes/no, rating,
    ranking features are supported). The developer team will also
    guarantee to provide timely support (within 24 hours) starting
    October 1.


    If you're a national jury coordinator or a jury member and want to
    test the current version of the tool, please leave a note on the
    tool’s discussion page
    <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:Montage>. If you
    want to have a 1:1 conversation with one of the developers, please
    leave a message using the same link. You should feel free to leave
    questions/comments about the tool in the same page. If you are
    familiar with GitHub, you can also create issues on GitHub
    <https://github.com/hatnote/montage/issues>. Please note that the
    developers will continue adding features and smoothing the
    workflow until October 1, what you will test now will give you a
    sense of the basics you should expect. :)

    What is essential for you to be able to start the jury process on
    October 1 using Montage is the Wikimedia usernames of your jury
    members (if they don't have an account, please ask them to open
    one). If you decide to go with Montage, please gather this
    information sooner rather than later.

    WLX

    You can learn more about the tool here
    <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:WLX_Jury_Tool>. The
    tool has been used by many countries as part of WLM and WLE
    contests in the past years. If you're interested to use WLX,
    please contact Ilya (WLX's tool developer) in the tool's talk page
    <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons_talk:WLX_Jury_Tool>.


    If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to
    ask them here or off-list.


    Best,

    Leila


-- User: LilyOfTheWest




_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

--
Cristian Cenci
Project manager Wiki Loves Monuments Italia
Coordinatore regionale per il Trentino-Alto Adige | Regionalkoordinator für Trentino-Südtirol
Wikimedia Italia – Associazione per la diffusione della conoscenza libera
Tel. +39 393 8005889 | [email protected] | www.wikimedia.it
_______________________________________________
Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments
http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org

Reply via email to