On Jan 22, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Risker wrote: > Having to manually update Google+ is a serious negative for its use: > volunteer time is a very precious resource. Simply because other groups > (most of which have paid employees) are doing it doesn't mean that every > group ought to invest its limited resources in doing so. It's not a popular > site, it's resource-intensive to maintain, and most of the target audience on > Google+ is also present on at least one of the other locations that are > regularly being maintained. I'd not consider it a priority. > > Risker/Anne
What Risker said. Wikimania 2012 had zero presence on Google+ so I wouldn't be surprised if Wikimania 2013 made the same decision. James Hare _______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
