It might be a little unfair, but sniping from the sidelines without offering
nay constructive proposal for improvement is not helpful.
Harry Mitchellhttp://enwp.org/User:HJ
Phone: +44 (0) 7507 536971
Skype: harry_j_mitchell
________________________________
From: Michael Peel <[email protected]>
To: Wikimania general list (open subscription)
<[email protected]>
Cc: Wikimedia Mailing List <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, 10 October 2014, 19:45
Subject: Re: [Wikimania-l] [Wikimedia-l] Wikimania 2016 - Jury Announcement
and Start of Bidding
That seems rather unfair. Fæ is raising some valid points about how this
process has taken place this year, which are worth addressing. Dismissing
concerns unless there is a comprehensive proposal for reform seems like a
reduction to bureaucracy…
Thanks,
Mike
On 10 Oct 2014, at 18:26, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not the only one waiting with interest to see Fae's
> comprehensive proposal for reforming the process. Once that proposal has been
> offered, anyone interested can comment on whether it is an improvement to the
> current process. If the consensus is that it is, great! If not, then we can
> move on. If no proposal for change is offered, then there isn't much to
> discuss.
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimania-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
_______________________________________________
Wikimania-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
