I think we do consider (1) and (2), but it's down to the scholarship team and local team to decide how they're implemented next year.
Deryck On 11 Jul, 2016 1:06 pm, "Pine W" <[email protected]> wrote: > A few other issues that may be worth examining: > > 1. Whether people who have not received a Wikimania scholarship within a > certain number of years should get priority for scholarships. > > 2. Whether users who are from backgrounds that don't have a corresponding > APG-funded affiliate that independently funds scholarships should have > priority for WMF scholarships > > 3. What the scholarship self-reports from the past several years tell us > about the benefits of Wikimania for scholarship recipients. > > 4. What Wikimetrics and qualitative measures tell us about Wikimania > attenance for attendees as a whole and about scholarship recipients as a > subgroup. For example, do we have data that demonstrates that (a) Wikimania > attendees in general, and (b) scholarship recipients, were more active in > the Wikimedia movement (measured quantitatively by edits and qualutatively > in terms of leadership roles) after attending Wikimania for the first or > second time? What can we learn from this data about the strengths and > weaknesses of Wikimania as well as the current scholarship system? > > Thanks, > Pine > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimania-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimania-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimania-l
