Statistically maybe. In terms of maintenance, absolutely.
But in terms of starting articles and updating them plus meaningful edits that only human intelligence can do, the bots can't claim that. Bot edits may form the majority statistically. But the story and topical edits that shape articles, is a human thing. The article was written by a journalist. And Oral you know our people. Suddenly experts on subjects they know nothing about, just to put out stories. On Feb 26, 2014 5:33 PM, "Oral Ofori" <[email protected]> wrote: > I guess they failed to count edits in developing countries, mostly in > Africa... where people like Rexford Nkansah amd Oarabile Mumdongo among > many others are making hard core edits by hand and mind. Pretty interesting > read though: > > http://www.newsweek.com/wikipedia-edited-bots-thats-good-thing-230234 > > > > > Oral > > www.about.me/oralofori > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-GH mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh > >
_______________________________________________ Wikimedia-GH mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
