Com'on... assume good faith !
I do the same when I am on a cleaning spree. When I discover troubles in
an article, I clean those related articles as well. And if the problems
all come from the same person, I investigate the person in checking all
their edits. That's just logical and I think this is what is currently
going on.
I do not want to sound unnice Rex... but I would be happier if you
focused on the REASONS why you are in trouble (= your edits, which are
often copyvios) rather than blaming it on the person doing clean up. It
may be that this person has not done it perfectly well (yeah, the
clean-up looks a little bit too thorough and yeah, the person does mix
up with the tags, true, no great), but the real problems are the edits
themselves. Be more careful in your editing job and the problem will
just disappear.
Ant
Le 06/03/15 20:26, Nkansah Rexford a écrit :
Looking at the rate, I believe its an attack directed at me
personally. So I'm taking them all! I don't even remember the edit I
did to that article!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nkansahrexford#Copyright_problem:_Huguenot_Memorial_Museum
Also from an IP address.
On Friday, March 6, 2015, rupert THURNER <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Sure, if you could restore it, at least in my or Rex personal
namespace...
On Mar 6, 2015 7:51 PM, "Florence Devouard" <[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
Le 06/03/15 19:41, Florence Devouard a écrit :
Le 06/03/15 19:09, rupert THURNER a écrit :
Yes please do send this list and try to improve them,
and then tell me how pleasant this work was.
Contrary, for the rocky dawuni article I d be
interested as well where the copyright infringement
was. I do not like that without admin permission it is
not possible to look this up...
Rupert
Also of interest in the conversation:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=650110340#Copyvio_-_removal_of_tags_by_Spearmind
Otherwise... with a quick study of what is going on about the
deletion spree, it seems that...
* in all articles, chunks are indeed copyvios. The chunks are
smaller or bigger depending on each case.
* in many cases, the article is blanked in its entirety, then
deleted.
Looks like it is a bit overkill to me. I see not why at least
a stub could be kept.
Ant
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
--
+Rexford <http://google.com/+Nkansahrexford> | khophi.co
<http://khophi.co/about>
_______________________________________________
African-Wikimedians mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/african-wikimedians
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-GH mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-gh
