On 10 April 2012 13:56, Jan-Bart de Vreede <[email protected]> wrote: > Sure > > "just about everything" > > as in > > 1) Who should be on this committee > 2) On what kind of requests should they form an opinion (not microgrants for > example) > 3) What are criteria > 4) What is the process/timeline > > + 401 other things that we can come up with as questions.
But how many of those things are actually going to be difficult or controversial? Shouldn't we at least try and answer them using our standard approach of having an open discussion on a wiki? If it turns out we can't answer them that way, then we can try a more elaborate approach then. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
