On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:56, Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > Disagree. The point of the NC and ND licenses isn't so much so they can be > used on Wikipedia but really as a stepping stone into CC for nervous types.
I hope this is true, but the handful of anecdotes I know of where someone moves in one direction (mostly individuals dropping NC and/or ND) or the other (sadly, Khan Academy) doesn't give me much confidence it is. > You might license something under CC BY-NC and watch it be reused a bit: > someone pops it into a blog post or into a PowerPoint deck. And, holy crap, > the world doesn't end, all is fine and nobody is being asked difficult > questions about evil Communist freedom-haters who want to destroy Western > civilisation. All is swell. Putting stuff on the Internet constitutes getting one's feet wet. Mike _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
