Richard, you removed some relevant language: "Certain activities, whether legal or illegal, may be harmful to other users and violate our rules, and some activities may also subject you to liability. Therefore, for your own protection and for that of other users, *you may not engage in such activities on our sites*. These activities include: [..] Using the services in a manner that is inconsistent with applicable law."
I think that expecting the ToS to condone violations of laws that are in some way "anti-freedom" is unrealistic. It seems like it would be difficult to craft language to do that well. ~Nathan On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Richard Symonds < richard.symo...@wikimedia.org.uk> wrote: > I don't think it does say that, or if it does, I can't see where. You're > certainly liable if you break a law in your own country, but I don't think > you've broken the terms of use. It says that > > > "Certain activites may subject you to liabilities... [for example] using > > the services in a manner that is inconsistent with applicable law." > > > This means, to my eyes, that you're potentially liable (to someone) if you > break the law in your own country - which makes perfect sense to me. > > But then, I am not a lawyer, nor do I work for the WMF. > > Richard Symonds > Wikimedia UK > 0207 065 0992 > Disclaimer viewable at > http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Email_disclaimer > Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk > > > > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
