On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:45 AM, John <[email protected]> wrote: > Simple.wikipedia is nothing like en.wikipedia I care to dispute that > statement, All WMF wikis are setup basically the same (an odd extension here > or there is different, and different namespace names at times) but for the > purpose of recovery simplewiki_p is a very standard example. this issue isnt > just about enwiki_p but *all* wmf wikis. Doing a data recovery for enwiki vs > simplewiki is just a matter of time, for enwiki a 5 day estimate would be > fairly standard (depending on server setup) and lower times for smaller > databases. typically you can explain it in a rate of X revisions processed > per Y time unit, regardless of the project. and that rate should be similar > for everything given the same hardware setup.
Are you compressing old revisions, or not? Does the WMF database compress old revisions, or not? In any case, I'm sorry, a 20 gig mysql database does not scale linearly to a 20 terabyte mysql database. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
