Not quite - Mike says that " it is updated...with the proposed deletions and speedy deletion articles (not notable and hoaxes, *not others*)."
Non-notable articles are arguably important to keep - they serve as a basis for recreating the articles in future, and for easy review by non-admins. Hoaxes are also important to keep publicy viewable - so that we can stop similar ones happening again, surely? Richard Symonds Wikimedia UK 0207 065 0992 Disclaimer viewable at http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia:Email_disclaimer Visit http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/ and @wikimediauk On 10 June 2012 18:29, Juergen Fenn <schneeschme...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2012/6/10 Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>: > > > I have launched speedydeletion.wika.com , it is updated every 30 minutes > > with the proposed deletions and speedy deletion articles (not notable and > > hoaxes, not others). > > Speedydeleted articles are either no articles at all, thus not worth > discussing, or they are copyright infrigements. I am sorry to say that > I do not happen to understand why you collect those pages in a > separate wiki. > > Regards, > Jürgen. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
