On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Michael Peel <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1. Compare and contrast with WMUK board meetings, where we regularly have > several (different) visitors attending each meeting, and also webcast our > board meetings wherever > possible. We have 'in-camera' elements as needed to protect the limited > amount of confidential discussion we need to have, but otherwise we're > striving for as much > transparency and openness as possible. We've yet to encounter distractions as > a result that haven't been rather constructive in the discussions that were being held.
How many visitors do you normally have at a meeting, and who are they? What sorts of interaction do they have / are they voiced? How are they invited / made aware of the possibility? > I think that this visitor's resolution is a great step forward for > transparency at the Board level of the WMF, but please consider being BOLD > and walking down the rest of the path. :-) I'd like that; and would like to see specific policies that other orgs implement to this end. SJ _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
