Milos, >BTW, 292:22 doesn't look like a lack of participation nor as a lack of >consensus. And the actions which affect the real world have their >right time, unlike building the knowledge.
Did you count how many of thsee 292 votes, especially among the last couple of hundred, have a right for RFA vote and how many among 22 (mainly opinions, not votes) are admins? The poll was formulated in such a way (against censorhip), that it begged for Support and the short time didn't allow a lot of people to express their opinion - an opinion have to be formulated, written down, even edited, unlike vote. What we have is a flasmob, which is very dangerous thing to approve. This time we were lucky that the poll was in general vein of the WM movement strategy, but knowing the situation in Russia we can (very soon) have, for example, a Russian Wikipedia for Russians banner on the main page after 300 editors voted for it. Regards Russian-speaking British/Belarusian citizen Victoria _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
