MZMcBride, 01/08/2012 03:10:
[2] has most of the
history, though I could swear a project or two has been "restarted" due to
bots over-running the site. Does anyone have a citation for that?

A citation for what? Anyway, the section seems correct except that it greatly overstates the importance of bot-created articles in the problems denounced by the "faction of the Lombard wikipedians" and in the consequences of its intervention (which was mostly meant as a brute-force restoration of the five pillars).


Wikimedia-l mailing list

Reply via email to