On Aug 21, 2012, at 3:17 PM, Todd Allen <toddmal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:19 PM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21 August 2012 19:44,  <birgitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Utilitarian work = uncopyrightable
>> 
>> 
>> Only under a fairly limited number of legal systems.
>> 
>> 

[[ciatation needed]]

I really doubt non-artistic works are copyrighted as a general rule anywhere (. 
. . but I have been wrong before).

Now clearly being able to judge that X is a utilitarian work is the more normal 
problem with this argument and why it is seldom used. Diagnostic images are one 
of the few clear-cut situations.

And even if it is only the US, other countries would not recognize copyright on 
diagnostic images created in the US, which gives us at least the NASA situation.

Birgitte SB
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to