On 21 August 2012 19:44,  <birgitte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> In most cases ( Covering the significant majority of all x-rays existing, but 
> not ruling out the possibility of rare uses of X-ray photography as an 
> artistic medium) .  . .
> 7 None of the above
> Utilitarian work = uncopyrightable


That photo, according to the licenses on that page, has copyright. Do
you disagree?

If you agree that that has copyright, why would essentially the same
photo taken using a different frequency of electromagnetic radiation
not have copyright? What is the difference?

Wikimedia-l mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to