On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dal...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 22 August 2012 20:50, Anthony <wikim...@inbox.org> wrote: >>> It possibly has a very thin copyright. >> >> Copyright doesn't have thickness. Either it is copyrightable or it isn't. > > Incorrect. In some works, some aspects are copyrighted, and some > aspects are not.
As for the term "thin" as it refers to copyright, see the seminal case of Feist. "This inevitably means that the copyright in a factual compilation is thin." _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l