On 22 September 2012 20:24, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's such a pity that Elsevier's attempt to legally block open access > requirements [1] means that they must be destroyed utterly with not
Of course, it's not all happy bunnies and rainbows and unicorns on the OA side. There's an obvious predatory model, and of course people trying it. Achal Prabhala pointed out this (excellent) article to me: http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/on-the-net-a-scam-of-a-most-scholarly-kind/article3939161.ece I wrote up another example here: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Bentham_Science_Publishers See also: http://metadata.posterous.com/83235355 https://www.facebook.com/POA.Publishers# - d. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l