Please note that I have been requesting an urgent correction to this statement 
since 21:17 today (it is now 23:00), without receiving any response from the 
WMF.

Thanks,
Mike

On 28 Sep 2012, at 21:18, Jay Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Posted to the WMF and WM UK blogs a few moments ago.
> 
> http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/09/28/joint-statement-from-wikimedia-foundation-and-wikimedia-uk/
> http://blog.wikimedia.org.uk/2012/09/joint-statement-from-wikimedia-foundation-and-wikimedia-uk/
> 
> ---
> 
> Joint statement from Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia UK
> 
> Over the past six months, a Wikimedia UK trustee led two Wikipedia-related 
> projects, Monmouthpedia and Gibraltarpedia, in a way that seemed to some 
> observers to blur his roles as a Wikimedia UK trustee, a paid consultant for 
> the projects’ government partners, and an editor of the English Wikipedia. 
> This raised questions in the Wikimedia community about whether a trustee was 
> able to balance appropriately the interests of his clients with his 
> responsibilities to Wikimedia UK, the values and editorial policies of 
> Wikipedia, and whether any conflict of interest that arose as a result was 
> effectively managed.
> 
> To better understand the facts and details of these allegations and to ensure 
> that governance arrangements commensurate with the standing of the Wikimedia 
> Foundation, Wikimedia UK and the worldwide Wikimedia movement, Wikimedia UK’s 
> trustees and the Wikimedia Foundation will jointly appoint an independent 
> expert advisor to objectively review both Wikimedia UK’s governance 
> arrangements and its handling of the conflict of interest.
> 
> The review will consider Wikimedia UK’s current governance arrangements, 
> current internal policies, such as the Trustee Code of Conduct, the Nolan 
> Committee Requirements, the Conflicts of Interest policy, the Representing 
> Wikimedia UK policy, any other relevant policies of Wikimedia UK, and best 
> ethical practices.
> 
> Considering specifically the conflict of interest, we will ask the expert 
> advisor to identify any gaps between how the conflict of interest situation 
> within Wikimedia UK would ideally have been handled and how it actually was 
> handled, and to recommend how situations such as this should be managed in 
> the future. The review will also touch on any activities that may have 
> blurred work as a paid consultant with work as a Wikipedia editor, but 
> recommendations for changes to Wikipedia’s policies and practices will be 
> outside its scope: we leave the broader topic of reviewing Wikipedia’s 
> editorial policies to the community.
> 
> Once the review is completed, it will be reviewed by both the Wikimedia 
> Foundation and Wikimedia UK and then published.
> 
> At the same time, Wikimedia UK has agreed with the Wikimedia Foundation that 
> the Foundation shall process payments for the United Kingdom during this 
> year’s fundraiser.
> 
> Wikimedia UK has the benefit of legal and professional advice to assist in 
> understanding and handling conflicts of interests. The goal of both 
> organizations in carrying out this review, and Wikimedia UK’s in deciding to 
> absent itself from the 2012 fundraising campaign as a payment processor, is 
> to demonstrate that we mutually recognize the importance of handling 
> conflicts well beyond simple requirements of the law. We understand our 
> responsibilities to you: the members of Wikimedia UK and the Wikimedia 
> movement, its donors, editors, and readers.
> _______________________________________________
> Please note: all replies sent to this mailing list will be immediately 
> directed to Wikimedia-l, the public mailing list of the Wikimedia community. 
> For more information about Wikimedia-l:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
> _______________________________________________
> WikimediaAnnounce-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediaannounce-l
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-Blog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-blog

_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l

Reply via email to