To end poverty, you can not just employ all who are poor, think that its 18% are managers, how many of the readers are in a precarious situation? This is one of the reasons I think this is bad focus, increasingly away from a social vision and increasingly commercial with its unique product, the Wikipedia...
"Imagine a world in which *every single human being* can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment." Bullshit, every human with money to buy a pc and have access to internet, and capable to donate. That's WMF commitment. On 25 October 2012 03:46, James Salsman <jsals...@gmail.com> wrote: > Again, I'm not going to go into detail about how I arrived at the 18% > figure for enwiki admins under the poverty line until the accusation > that I violated the Privacy Policy is withdrawn or my questions about > it are addressed. I am confident that it's accurate within a few > percent. Instead of criticizing my spelling, I think it would be > better if Foundation officials determined the figure for themselves. > > It is sad that those who are very well off are so quick to exclude the > possibility of helping impoverished long term contributors. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton rodrigo.argen...@gmail.com +55 11 97 97 18 884 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
