On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Tim Starling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it enough to set the <link rel="canonical">, or is it also > necessary to redirect? > When I asked the nice folks at Google's search team, they answered me the following: * The best answer would for them to use rel=canonical tags so that http://example.wikimedia.uz points to http*s*://example.wikimedia.uz. So I'd send them this page: http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394 and tell them to start doing that. If they're very serious (and it's a small property, so there's not much risk) then they could make every http page 301 to the https version as well. I don't know how much effort each of these two measures would be. If you'd ask me, I would suggest to be "very serious", but we are not under a deadline (the situation has been like this for more than a year now), and setting the rel="caonical" would already be really, really helpful. Thank you all for your encouraging comments so far. _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
