Even if I'm really in favor of sound content in articles, I'm not sure that a license like the CC by SA is good for that. Do the subject are really aware of what it means?, that their voice could be used without their consent afterwards?
It could be a good opportunity to open a constructive discussion about new license with NC and ND option? Charles Le 8 févr. 2013 à 14:57, Andy Mabbett <a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk> a écrit : > I'd like to ask your support the project I started: > > > <http://pigsonthewing.org.uk/open-licensed-format-recordings-voices-wikipedia-wikimedia-commons/> > > asking the subjects of Wikipedia articles to record a 10-second sample > of their speaking voice, for use on those articles. > > An example script is "Hello, my name is [name]. I was born in [place] > and I have been [job or position] since [year]". > > So far, the participants: > > <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Voice_intro_project> > > include Sue Black, Cory Doctorow, Bill Thompson and Dave Winer; and > we've just had our first recording in French - but we need many more. > > Do you know anyone who has an article about them? Do you know of tools > that would simplify the process of making ogg files, open licensing > them, and uploading them to Commons? How can we include more speakers > of other languages? > > -- > Andy Mabbett > @pigsonthewing > http://pigsonthewing.org.uk > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
