Ok, I really understand that, but with they those GFDL? What we can do?
On 24 February 2013 06:54, Tomasz Ganicz <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/2/24 Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <[email protected]>: > > Why We don't change your license in pages that gonna receive this > content? > > (I know this is not the best license ever made, but why always the other > > need to be adapt to us, not the opposite?) > > > > Using GPL license for textual content hardly make any sense... It puts > users to a kind of uncertainty what he/she really can do with it as > the license does not contain explanation what is allowed to do with > content, which is not a piece of software. Open wiki textual content > has to be uniformly licensed as every edit is from legal POV creation > of derivative work of previous version. > > > -- > Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz > http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek > http://www.ganicz.pl/poli/ > http://www.cbmm.lodz.pl/work.php?id=29&title=tomasz-ganicz > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton [email protected] +55 11 979 718 884 _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
