We are working on building a more coherent discussion system - see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/FlowPortal
On 27 March 2013 17:39, Everton Zanella Alvarenga <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for sharing the IdeaLab portal. [1] I didn't know it, although > I knew portals and individual inside him, like the Individual > Engagement Grants. I don't have time now to make longer comments, but > two questions: > > 1) Is there a possibility for thie committee to be more open, like the > WMF grants program? [2] > > 2) Isn't time for we think out of the box, I mean, out of the wiki and > try technologies that can foster the community evaluation of > projetcs/idea and discussions? I know the question is too general, but > recently, for isntance, I thought about using a reddit like system for > the Portuguese Wikipedia village pump for the community distringuish > try to distinguish what is good or not. I mentioned something like All > Our Ideas once <http://www.allourideas.org/>, but I think there are > other things worth trying, if possible. > > P. S. Just look the discussion system inside a wiki. Damn. > > Tom > > [1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab > [2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:Index > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Jessie Wild <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Any initial thoughts on how to maximize the effectiveness of those two > > ideas (IdeaLab and Learning Portal)? > > > -- > Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom) > "A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful > than a life spent doing nothing." > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > -- Oliver Keyes Community Liaison, Product Development Wikimedia Foundation _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
