Hmm. Once again, I largely agree with WSC. Unless I'm missing something, this
idea is largely about fundraising, and I think it could introduce more problems
than it solves.
The evidence that I've seen suggest that WMF is very successful at fundraising,
but has ongoing difficulties with making progress toward the goal to get
200,000 active editors by 2015. So, I see little reason to implement page
adoption if the goal is to fundraise, but if there is something about the
proposal that's relevant to improving the active editor count from the current
85,000, I'd be interested in at least learning more about that.
Pine
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
