Hello, I also think that it should not be seen as blasphemy when someone suggests to reconsider a Wikimedia project. (Remember Asaf's session in Milan.) Isn't Wikispecies not already redundant because in Wikipedia every species is notable anyway?
Kind regards Ziko Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013 schrieb Gerard Meijssen : > Hoi, > Taxonomy is not the thing that occupies me. It is however something I have > experience with.. Everyone who knows anything about the taxonomy of plants > can confirm that a taxon without publishing details is incomplete. > Thanks, > Gerard > > > On 3 June 2013 17:03, Magnus Manske > <magnusman...@googlemail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Gerard Meijssen > > <gerard.meijs...@gmail.com <javascript:;>>wrote: > > > > > > > > Really, taxonomy is tricky. FYI I have an 80 MB database with ONLY > cacti > > > and succulents. I learned a lot in the process. > > > > > > So, have you imported that to Wikidata yet? > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikimedia-l mailing list > > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org <javascript:;> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l > -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ziko van Dijk voorzitter / president Wikimedia Nederland deputy chair Wikimedia Chapters Association Council Vereniging Wikimedia Nederland Postbus 167 3500 AD Utrecht http://wikimedia.nl -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
