On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Benoit Landry <[email protected]>wrote:
> What "information" could the WMF disclose that isn't already available to > some volunteers anyhow? I don't know what information "some volunteers" have access to, who qualifies as "some volunteers" (does the board qualify?), or why it matters whether or not a person is a volunteer. By access logs I meant HTTP access logs. It's pretty clear that without taking extraordinary measures, what you're editing is not anonymous. But some people are probably under the impression that what they're reading and searching (and linking from) is private. The IP addresses of logged-in editors are visible to volunteer CUs; En-masse, or one-request-at-a-time? deleted revisions and log entries are visible to all volunteers admins. > Wikipedia's inherently a pretty transparent system... > Transparent? _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
