Well, not wanting to wade into that "pirates' little helpers" snarkiness, but it takes 30 seconds from anywhere on the web to find a copyright violation. Maybe a bit longer if you have a slow connection.
Risker On 9 July 2013 23:36, Fred Bauder <fredb...@fairpoint.net> wrote: > > On 07/09/2013 08:37 PM, Fred Bauder wrote: > >> How is that not theft that we are facilitating? > > > > Because "theft", is to deprive, temporarily or absolutely, the owner of > > it, or a person who has a special property or interest in it, of the > > thing or of his property or interest in it. > > > > In some jurisdiction, linking to sites that play fast and loose with > > Copyright /may/, in certain circumstances, be facilitating copyright > > infringement. It certainly isn't "theft". > > > > (I am not saying the latter is okay -- but that calling copyright > > infringement "theft" is inflammatory rhetoric and intellectually > > dishonest, at best). > > > > -- Marc > > Interesting notion that plain talk is "inflammatory" and "dishonest." How > is deliberate copyright infringement is not theft? Why are we the > pirates' little helpers? > > Fred > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediaemail@example.com Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>