On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:36 PM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Daniel Mietchen < > daniel.mietc...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I could imagine that certain types of bots, tools and gadgets would >> benefit if handled and developed with support from a chapter. >> >> For instance, >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Citation_bot >> is used widely but cannot be maintained by its original author. >> It is currently being ported to Labs ( >> https://github.com/wrought/citation-bot ) >> to restore functionality, but due to ongoing developments in other >> areas (e.g. citation templates), adaptations are necessary on an >> ongoing basis. Who should do that? And what about feature requests? >> > > Yes! From a user perspective, that's definitely an area of need, and a > great example too. Personal note: I LOVE Citation Bot, and I hope it comes > back soon!
It appears to be operating https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Citation_bot So chapters can offer to help porting tools like this to Labs and ongoing maintenance of these tools? Is there a list of such tools that have been identified as needing paid support? -- John Vandenberg _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
