On 30 July 2013 14:13, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 July 2013 17:03, Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
> >If the overwhelming community sentiment
> > is that the cost of continuous improvement with a large scale user
> > base is larger than the benefit (as it was on dewiki), we'll switch
> > back (or to a compromise), and use a more rigid set of acceptance
> > criteria and a less rigid deadline for getting back into large scale
> > usage later in the year.
> de:wp convinced you. What would it take to convince you on en:wp? (I'm
> asking for a clear objective criterion here. If you can only offer a
> subjective one, please explain how de:wp convinced you when en:wp
> hasn't.)
Just noting in passing:

Wikimedia-l mailing list
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 

Reply via email to