We could hire expert staff to deal with serious socking by dangerous or highly disruptive users. Their wages would be the damage.
Fred > An additional issue, if we're still talking CFAA's private right of > action, > is where would the minimum damage requirements come from? > > -Dan > > Dan Rosenthal > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Nathan <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Discussed several times with no clear outcome. >> > >> http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikimedia-l/2013-January/123678.html >> > >> > < >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-10-06#WSJ_Op-Ed_.22Should_Faking_a_Name_on_Facebook_Be_a_Felony.3F.22 >> > >> > < >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-11-08#Is_this_enforceable.3F >> > >> > < >> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Terms_of_use/Archives/2011-12-13#Criminal_liability_for_breaching_the_TOU >> > >> > >> > Nemo >> > >> > >> >> That is, frankly, a very different issue (in fact, other than >> implicating the CFAA, could hardly be more different). >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikimedia-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, >> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > [email protected] > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
