Per "c) most reputable journals now have robust ethics & subject-consent policies and so we can work on the basis that images published in them will be ethically usable"
If this were true, which it isn't by the way, than that would mean that commons is only a repository for professionally published material. Sort of defeats the purpose of commons in a way. -- James Heilman MD, CCFP-EM, Wikipedian The Wikipedia Open Textbook of Medicine www.opentextbookofmedicine.com _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
