> "The inherent complexity and controversy of carbon footprints". > What do you mean by that?
Even those who fight for inclusion of the facts about climate change on Wikipedia aren't very likely to follow the peer reviewed secondary literature when it comes to reporting the extent of changes in extreme weather. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Extreme_weather&action=history has some good examples, with more going back years. There's really no way to get Wikipedia to correctly reflect controversial topics unless you are willing to invest the time it takes to counter conflicted interest editing. Good luck! _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
