How are the edit functions in Monobook more prominent than in Vector?
> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:24:52 +0100 > From: nemow...@gmail.com > To: wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Monobook was optimised for editors, Vector is more > balanced between readers and edtors > > WereSpielChequers, 22/11/2013 08:03: > > But it would be interesting to see some stats on the relative > > retention and upgrading of editors who use monobook and Vector. > > The idea sounds crazy, but yes, why not, let's test this. I believe you > can put your thoughts on a Meta-Wiki Research: page, describing the > background, the A/B test and the proposed analysis, and then ask the WMF > to run it (preferably with the consensus of the target wikis, but it's > not usually considered necessary for so-called experimentations). > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
