On 31 January 2014 19:07, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > >... Most people who are already in a current job are not going > > to be willing to have open debates about the job opportunities they are > > seeking. Not only because their 'boss' will know but also because if they > > are in a public company that could cause large issues in the market > etc.... > > Do we really want to select against people who aren't open to > discussion of their individual merits, even if that means selecting > against those who already have a job they want to keep? > > This is additional support for the use of a (potentially mutual) > Co-director position, which would be an effective way to have a trial > period for any candidate. It doesn't have to be high-stakes up front, > and would be easy to revert in the case of bad fit or Board regret. > >
Actually, I think that we should consider it a strength in an individual to refuse to consider applying for a position where every aspect of their career and personal life would be microscopically examined by thousands of people. Self-respect is a positive attribute. Risker _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
