On 4 February 2014 14:03, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote: .. > The vast majority of users who do a lot of bot edits are still merrily > working away on English Wikipedia.
As someone who has made around 3 million automated edits on Commons and uploaded over 200,000 valuable educational images there, I would love to do similar work to benefit the English Wikipedia. I do not feel in the least bit encouraged to even try to set up a content creation or even an uncontroversial en.wp house-keeping project in 2014 considering how much of my volunteer time would be lost it debate any proposal there is likely to create, compared to the simplicity of other Wikimedia projects. Knowing what happens to anyone who becomes "of interest" and has a large number of edits, along with the associated endless repeated attempts to find any single problematic edit out of hundreds of thousands of perfectly good content creation, I find the word "merrily" a poor choice. The extraordinary case that Sam mentioned has been a widely discussed lesson to all bot-writers, many of us carefully do our work in a way that avoids ever attempting to put our heads above the parapet and risk becoming targets of depressing damaging witch-hunts, reputation ruining bad faith allegations and extreme effectively *years*-long sanctions from those with big hammers. So rather than "merrily" one might better chose from "cautiously", "covertly" or even "fearfully" and "not". Risker, out of interest, considering my long track record of useful bot-work on Commons, would you support my proposal to let Faebot do some sensible non-controversial work on en.wp or do you think I am a danger to Wikimedia? Fae -- fae...@gmail.com http://j.mp/faewm _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>