2014-02-11 23:01 GMT+01:00 Risker <risker...@gmail.com>: > Consensus is not the same as unanimity, and anyone who's crossed a few > different Wikimedia projects will know that what is defined as consensus > varies pretty widely, from majority +1 to 80% or higher support. For the > purposes of board votes, it's majority +1.
I disagree with this interpretation. The major point is "what are the reasons for the dissent?" 2014-02-11 23:01 GMT+01:00 Risker <risker...@gmail.com>: > I'm actually quite pleased that the board has moved away from twisting > itself in knots trying to ensure unanimous support of proposals: it led to > watered-down, poorly structured decisions that have often left the > community confused and uncertain as to their intent. 2014-02-11 23:01 GMT+01:00 Bence Damokos <bdamo...@gmail.com>: > Speaking in my personal capacity, I echo the surprise that the Board has > decided to move a motion before they had full or close to full consensus on > the issue - which is in general a departure from the usual. Well, it seems we have two very different ideas here. C _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimediafirstname.lastname@example.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>