Imo having a centralized funding model is very good against corruption (we had a couple of cases already and unfortunately we will some in the future)
As a side comment, it would be nice if we could learn the total donations/country figures ( for example: Hungary 2013: $12,345.67) If this info is already public then sorry, I was unable to locate it myself. Balazs 2014-04-10 16:20 GMT+02:00 <mathias.dam...@laposte.net>: > Hi, > > > Message du 10/04/14 15:28 > > De : "Anders Wennersten" > > A : wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > > Copie à : > > Objet : Re: [Wikimedia-l] Funding of decentralized organizational > structure > > > (...) > And I would be unhappy if the divergence between project became too big, > POV paid editing etc we will be stronger as a totality if we abide to the > same base guidelines So I question your urge and need to decentralize. For > am as a contributer the most important part is that I know my inputs is > securely stored and will not be misused by actors like google or plain > advertising. And for this reason I believe in a centralized structure as > about today (for now) Anders > > I don't tink that Ting Chen is disputing that the WMF should keep the core > work. Yet the core work may mean about 20% of the movement resources > instead of 90%... > > Mathias > [[User:Astirmays]] > > _______________________________________________ > Wikimedia-l mailing list > Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, > <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe> > _______________________________________________ Wikimedia-l mailing list Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
