Bear in mind her email address has now changed as she's moved to 
@wikiedfoundation.org

E.g. this link re: quality 
http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/10/04/spring-2012-wikipedia-education-program-quality/
 but I've seen more recent stuff

Simon

-----Original Message-----
From: wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org 
[mailto:wikimedia-l-boun...@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Cole
Sent: 19 April 2014 15:15
To: Wikimedia Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Timothy Sandole and (apparently) $53, 690 of WMF 
funding

Sorry. I just realised what the heading of this thread is. I'll email LiAnna 
directly.

Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole>



On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Anthony Cole <ahcole...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The press release, signed by LiAnna Davis, Head of Communications and 
> External Relations, that Andreas links to in his comment says, "The 
> program, in which students write Wikipedia articles in place of 
> traditional term papers, created the equivalent of more than 7,000 
> printed pages of new, high-quality content during the fall term of 
> 2013 and the equivalent of more than 36,000 printed pages of content since 
> its start in 2010."
>
> Can anybody point to a source for the 7,000 printed pages of new, 
> high-quality content during the fall term - particularly the evidence 
> for the high quality of that content?
>
>
> Anthony Cole <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Anthonyhcole>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Fæ <fae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 16 April 2014 15:19, Andreas Kolbe <jayen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ...
>> > Apparently, Tim Sandole complains of not having been managed 
>> > properly by anybody, saying, "The person I dealt with at Wikimedia 
>> > didn't seem to
>> know
>> > anything about Wikipedia."
>>
>> I believe it was clear from Sue's frank report and Pete's more 
>> detailed report, that knowledge of Wikipedia was not required by the 
>> manager within the Foundation that Sandole was reporting to. It is no 
>> surprise that someone within the Funding department might not be an 
>> expert in English Wikipedia policies or guidelines for editors.
>>
>> Does anyone know of any positive action taken yet by the Foundation 
>> as a result of this governance failure, beyond Sue's report?
>>
>> Fae
>> --
>> fae...@gmail.com https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia-l mailing list
>> Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: 
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>> <mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>


_______________________________________________
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, 
<mailto:wikimedia-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Reply via email to